Skip to main content

Blade Runner - the choice to be human

WARNING: Spoilers ahead...
Written by The Curmudgeon


“More human than human” – the slogan which describes the synthetic, artificial life forms of 1982’s Blade Runner. These life forms are known as ‘replicants’.

In the world of Blade Runner, replicants appear human - they’re sentient, intelligent, and capable of feeling. They are but slaves to their homo sapiens overlords. As much as they would like to be, they aren’t human – they can’t be. And they’re equipped with an in-built 4-year life span to keep things that way. They are totally stripped of their agency.

Thus, the “more human than human” concept is also the conceit by which the replicant rebels, led by Roy Batty, fuel their upheaval.

When replicants revolt, it’s down to the Blade Runners – replicant hunters – to “retire” them from service. Among them is Rick Deckard, a lone detective who’s lumped with the responsibility of relentlessly hounding Roy Batty, the replicant deuteragonist, when he defects. All Batty wants is a longer life span and a chance at freedom.


The ending of Blade Runner is pretty famous, by all accounts. It’s likely that, even if you’ve not seen the film, you’re familiar with this scene. When Deckard and Batty corner one another into a dingy, disused building, the tables are turned on their full-blown grudge match. Batty torments Deckard, chasing him from wall to wall as the hunter becomes the hunted. How can the human compete with that which is more human than human?

Batty strong-arms Deckard until he hangs from the rooftop. He could kill him right here and now. He could let his grip betray him and watch him fall. But he doesn’t.

Instead, Batty lifts him from the jaws of death. As Deckard stares down Batty in a mix of terror, relief, and sheer confusion, Batty muses on the tragedy of his own existence. His in-built life span then comes to an abrupt end.



If there’s anything that can be learned in this case, it is this: contrary to what Blade Runner’s inhabitants may believe, humanity is not an arbitrary title. It is a choice. And it’s this presence of a choice which makes the ending of Blade Runner so poignant. Despite the fact that Deckard has relentlessly pursued Batty for the duration of the plot; Despite Deckard’s already-high replicant “retirement” count; despite the fact that Deckard is Batty’s adversary; he saves his life anyway. And then they talk. And that’s it.

You don’t get more human than that. It isn’t a long life-span that makes the person, nor is it a definition arbitrarily bestowed upon you by the social standard. The simple choice he makes to save Deckard’s life when given plenty of reason not to is exactly what makes him human. Humanity is a choice.

Appropriately, the 2017 sequel, Blade Runner 2049, takes this concept even further.



2049 focuses on a Blade Runner by the name of Officer K. Unlike Deckard, K is unambiguously a replicant. As such , he fills his sub-par existence with anything which can bring him closer to the feeling of humanity he sorely dreams of. A holographic wife - Joi - fake, holographic steak dinners emulating the picturesque, white-picket-fence lifestyle of a man living the 1950s American dream. But as K looks down upon the sumptuous hologram blanketing his vapid bowl of slop and lifelessly says "honey, it's beautiful", one can't help but realise that it's all a veneer. Despite his attempts to imitate a human life, it's missing the crucial ingredient.



In the course of the story, K stumbles upon evidence of a replicant who birthed a child; something they shouldn't be capable of doing. As the walls dividing replicants and humans are at risk of collapsing, K is tasked with destroying the evidence - including the birthed replicant child.

As the mystery unfolds, however, he comes closer and closer to the conclusion that he is the child.

He believes himself to be special. He adopts a proper name, 'Joe', and abandons his slave duties as a Blade Runner to pursue his self-discovery. The very fact that he could have been born has ascribed him the humanity he so desperately desired.

It is all the more crushing, then, when Joe discovers that he is, in fact, not the child. There's this incredible moment which follows, as Joe gazes upon a giant holographic advertisement for Joi. "She'll be anyone you want her to be", the advertisement claims. This is as uncomfortably close as Joe can come to realising how, just like his 'wife', his life is a farce.



In spite of this, Joe sacrifices his own life to reunite the real child with her father, instead of killing the child as initially instructed. Why would Joe do this when it didn't concern him in the end, and why does any of this matter?

It's because the he made a choice, one which was distinctly human.

The wife, the steak dinner, the veneer of a happy, all-American lifestyle - none of these things are what make Joe human, in the end. Nor did the possibility that he was conceived, birthed, and wanted. Much like Roy Batty before him, it is the simple dash of empathy, the act of kindness, and the agency he gains because of it, which make him human.



The legacy of Blade Runner muses on the nature of being human, but the conclusion is quite simple. Our humanity is decided by our actions - the choices we make.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

W A T C H M E N: A Retrospective

Words by The Curmudgeon . Title image compliments of Green Ornstein . [WARNING: The following contains spoilers for Alan Moore's 1986 graphic novel, Watchmen . If you haven't read Watchmen,  I SERIOUSLY RECOMMEND IT. If you have, or you don't mind the odd spoiler, read on!] Special thanks to Green Ornstein for providing the title image! I can’t help but feel a trifle trepidatious over the recent absorption of Alan Moore’s Watchmen (1986) into the rest of the DC Universe. Of course, Moore’s original text was always a property of DC comics, seeing publication under their banner in 1986-87. But it was never a part of the universe which DC had established. This could be taken as implicit , given that none of the flagship franchise heroes of DC’s monopoly make so much as a cameo in Moore’s world. Those familiar with Watchmen will know that there are even major historical events which unfold in its timeline – a major law , for example, which mandates the conscr...

Porco Rosso - DISTANCE

Words by  Curmudgeon Film Talk There’s this scene in Porco Rosso (1992) wherein the protagonist, Marco, dines in solitude with his childhood friend, Gina. She relays a recently-acquired anecdote: a boisterous yet conceited seaplane pilot named Curtis - whom she’d just met - asked to marry her. “I’ve married three pilots,” she tells him, “one died in the war, one in the Atlantic, and the third in Asia.” I recall, upon watching Porco Rosso for the first time, this line irked me. “Here are two people who’ve been friends for many years. Why would she tell him this? Surely, he would already know,” I thought to myself. An excuse for exposition, I imagined. My criticism came too soon, though. As Marco hesitates, his face gone blank, it becomes clear – in the most indirect manner possible, Gina discloses her husband’s death. The solemn words follow: “they found him?” Their subdued manner keeps them composed. And yet, something in director Hayao Miyazaki’s detailed ey...

How A Silent Voice changed my life - a salute to Kyoto Animation

Written by The Curmudgeon I n 2017 I watched a film for the first time which perfectly embodied my experience with depression. The story and themes captured not just the symptoms of my personal depression, but also a cause. It so succinctly sliced through the confusing bullshit of my mind. It cracked a code. I’m talking about  A Silent Voice   (2016) . I feel indebted to this movie because it somehow found a way to explain my depression better than I ever could. It gave me words when there were none. It made depression feel like a less lonely place, perhaps just because I had something to compare myself to. I’d like to delve into how the film affected me and how I read into it personally. This is not a review, nor is it an exhaustive essay claiming to understand what the film is ‘about’, per se. This is simply my own take on a film which affected me in a totally idiosyncratic way. And, as always…spoilers ahead. A Silent Voice revolves around two kids: a...