Skip to main content

Ephemerality in Cowboy Bebop


Written by The Curmudgeon
There’s this fantastic video by the YouTube essayist “Channel Criswell which dissects the episodic nature of Shinichiro Watanabe's 1998 series Cowboy Bebop (check it out here). The piece satisfyingly interrogates the narrative distance that forms between the protagonists and the stories which they inhabit, from which the episodic structure stems. While I think everything in the video is pretty spot-on, it got the gears in my brain turning, and I guess I'd quite like to try my hand at discussing the existential angst of Cowboy Bebop.

In as few words as possible, I would go on to suggest that the most important effect that the episodic structure has on Cowboy Bebop is an everlasting sense of ephemerality. This ephemeral tone (although not exclusively symptomatic of episodism) is what I intend to unpack.

In case anyone reading this is unfamiliar with Cowboy Bebop, it essentially revolves around a group of space bounty hunters in the year 2077, Spike, Jet, Faye and Ed, drifting aimlessly from misadventure to misadventure. As opposed to a standard serial encompassing one extended plot, Cowboy Bebop is instead presented in the form of various individual stories. Each episode introduces and concludes singular plots within the 22-minute running time.

Naturally, this results in a scenario in which our protagonists remain detached from the overarching story. Simply put, the consequence of an absent narrative through-line is that there is a limit to how involved the characters can become before the episode ends and they disappear to pursue another bounty. The essence of their vocation dictates a lifestyle in which their human interactions are short-lived by necessity. Their lives are fleeting; ephemeral.

Their own attitudes perhaps magnify this. As is aptly suggested in episode 7 Heavy Metal Queen, “human beings are just a price tag to them, they live by gambling on other people’s lives.” In episode 1, Asteroid Blues, an introductory dialogue sees Spike and Jet bickering over a bounty and a lacklustre dinner. At this point, it becomes obvious that their approach to their work matters to them only insofar as it’ll pay for their next meal. This trivialisation upholds an emotional distance from their various passing misadventures.

All of this is to say that Cowboy Bebop captures a certain sense of transience in the lives of its central characters. The temporary nature of their interactions and their own detached lifestyle indicates as much. What is especially poignant, however, is how this is contextualised.

To elaborate, I’d first like to draw attention to the final shot of episode 1. Without giving away too much, the crew unsuccessfully pursue a bounty which results in the death of two people. A distinctive point is made that they continue their lives unaffected by this (click here for more detail), and the episode ends with an image of the Bebop ship, alone in space, small and dwarfed by the abyss which surrounds them. As such, their transitory and detached existence becomes fairly understandable. As they float, minuscule by comparison to the vast space which consumes them, their existential fragility couldn’t be more blatant. The distance which they maintain through their ever-fleeting routine could thus be seen as a means of defending themselves from the inherent existential pressure of their own existence.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Carole and Tuesday vs. Kids on the Slope - Part 1.

Written by The Curmudgeon SPOILER WARNING: The following contains spoilers for both Carole and Tuesday and Kids on the Slope . Go watch them first if you don't want the plot spoiled. If you have seen them, or you just don't care, read on! I love Shinichiro Watanabe. I love ‘im. He’s responsible for some of my favourite things; from Cowboy Bebop  (1998)  – smart, sombre, and slick – to the utterly hilarious and bizarre Space Dandy  (2014) , he’s got a style that suits me just fine. Although it’s unlikely he’ll ever make something which moves me quite like Bebop , he always finds a way to imbue his work with such panache. Also, he wears sunglasses all the damn time. I’m not kidding, it’s actually challenging to find out what this man’s eyes look like. The problem is that he doesn’t helm too many original titles. As such, when Watanabe’s most recent series, Carole and Tuesday  (2019), debuted this year, it made some serious waves. Something about this...

Porco Rosso - DISTANCE

Words by  Curmudgeon Film Talk There’s this scene in Porco Rosso (1992) wherein the protagonist, Marco, dines in solitude with his childhood friend, Gina. She relays a recently-acquired anecdote: a boisterous yet conceited seaplane pilot named Curtis - whom she’d just met - asked to marry her. “I’ve married three pilots,” she tells him, “one died in the war, one in the Atlantic, and the third in Asia.” I recall, upon watching Porco Rosso for the first time, this line irked me. “Here are two people who’ve been friends for many years. Why would she tell him this? Surely, he would already know,” I thought to myself. An excuse for exposition, I imagined. My criticism came too soon, though. As Marco hesitates, his face gone blank, it becomes clear – in the most indirect manner possible, Gina discloses her husband’s death. The solemn words follow: “they found him?” Their subdued manner keeps them composed. And yet, something in director Hayao Miyazaki’s detailed ey...

W A T C H M E N: A Retrospective

Words by The Curmudgeon . Title image compliments of Green Ornstein . [WARNING: The following contains spoilers for Alan Moore's 1986 graphic novel, Watchmen . If you haven't read Watchmen,  I SERIOUSLY RECOMMEND IT. If you have, or you don't mind the odd spoiler, read on!] Special thanks to Green Ornstein for providing the title image! I can’t help but feel a trifle trepidatious over the recent absorption of Alan Moore’s Watchmen (1986) into the rest of the DC Universe. Of course, Moore’s original text was always a property of DC comics, seeing publication under their banner in 1986-87. But it was never a part of the universe which DC had established. This could be taken as implicit , given that none of the flagship franchise heroes of DC’s monopoly make so much as a cameo in Moore’s world. Those familiar with Watchmen will know that there are even major historical events which unfold in its timeline – a major law , for example, which mandates the conscr...